Post by Wonderpill on Nov 1, 2010 9:07:31 GMT -5
looks like it plays just like Wii plus.
I honestly was all sorts of happy to play the sword game on the wii, with the new control thingy... and I figured that shooting the gun part would be like house of the dead or something.
For what ever reason, it just felt wrong, accuracy was way of the mark, and over all i knew i had more response with a regular controller.
I still don't see what all the fuss is about... Nintendo already said that the wii was dieing, NINTENDO said it... so why do the other companies think that they will succeed where Nintendo failed?
So what is your input on it, because I really dont see where the cost qualifies anything, whether kinect or move... I just don't see it being any more fun than playing a retro game, where the new thing to do actually has no depth, but you feel you need to squeeze your money out of it.
I played Super Mario Bros. pretty much daily for almost 2 years... same goes for my other NES games, and intellivision, and now when I play those same games, I am bored in 15-20 minutes... this is exactly how I see light gun games, wrestling games, scratch that all sports games.
So now they create move and kinect to have the same type of shallow games, meant to be candy for fat kids, and they try to sneak in the control scheme into other types of games.
If this delays Gran Turismo 5, I swear to god, I will just buy it on Playstation 4... the same goes for any other games getting delayed a week or 6 months (aka GEARS OF WAR 3) just to add in support for kinect... which I can already tell from commercials and what not, there is almost a full second of delay between the camera and the game... when button input has almost no lag...
anyway, the games that are designed for the move seem to work like they should, but again a slight lag, and a slight discrepancy in what you do matching with on screen... but its only $150...
I honestly was all sorts of happy to play the sword game on the wii, with the new control thingy... and I figured that shooting the gun part would be like house of the dead or something.
For what ever reason, it just felt wrong, accuracy was way of the mark, and over all i knew i had more response with a regular controller.
I still don't see what all the fuss is about... Nintendo already said that the wii was dieing, NINTENDO said it... so why do the other companies think that they will succeed where Nintendo failed?
So what is your input on it, because I really dont see where the cost qualifies anything, whether kinect or move... I just don't see it being any more fun than playing a retro game, where the new thing to do actually has no depth, but you feel you need to squeeze your money out of it.
I played Super Mario Bros. pretty much daily for almost 2 years... same goes for my other NES games, and intellivision, and now when I play those same games, I am bored in 15-20 minutes... this is exactly how I see light gun games, wrestling games, scratch that all sports games.
So now they create move and kinect to have the same type of shallow games, meant to be candy for fat kids, and they try to sneak in the control scheme into other types of games.
If this delays Gran Turismo 5, I swear to god, I will just buy it on Playstation 4... the same goes for any other games getting delayed a week or 6 months (aka GEARS OF WAR 3) just to add in support for kinect... which I can already tell from commercials and what not, there is almost a full second of delay between the camera and the game... when button input has almost no lag...
anyway, the games that are designed for the move seem to work like they should, but again a slight lag, and a slight discrepancy in what you do matching with on screen... but its only $150...